Buying Assets Out Of Bankruptcy – Do Not Wait Until The End

Sold Gavel: Buying Assets Out Of Bankruptcy –  Do Not Wait Until The End

363 sales, also known as 11 USC (United States Code) section 363 sales, play a crucial role in bankruptcy proceedings. This provision allows debtors-in-possession or bankruptcy trustees to sell assets quickly and efficiently outside of the ordinary course of business. These sales are governed by the United States Bankruptcy Code and provide a streamlined process for the liquidation or reorganization of assets in bankruptcy cases. 

Under section 363, a debtor-in-possession or trustee has the authority to sell a bankrupt company's assets, including both tangible and intangible assets, to generate funds for the benefit of creditors. The purpose of these sales is to maximize the value of the assets and facilitate the resolution of financial distress.

The key advantage of 363 sales is their ability to expedite the asset sale process. Unlike traditional bankruptcy sales, which can be lengthy and complex, 363 sales offer a more efficient mechanism. This enables debtors to sell their assets promptly, minimizing the risks associated with market fluctuations and asset deterioration over time.

Furthermore, 363 sales provide flexibility in the sale process. The debtor or trustee can negotiate and structure the sale to meet the specific needs of the bankruptcy case. This flexibility allows for creative solutions, such as selling assets as a going concern, where the buyer can acquire the assets along with the associated contracts, licenses, or customer base.

Additionally, 363 sales offer certain protections to buyers. The sale is subject to court approval, ensuring that the process is fair and equitable to all parties involved. This approval provides a level of certainty and safeguards against potential challenges to the sale in the future.

363 sales, also known as 11 USC section 363 sales, provide an efficient and flexible mechanism for the sale of assets in bankruptcy cases. These sales expedite the process, maximize value, and offer protections to both debtors and buyers. Whether it is a liquidation or a reorganization, 363 sales serve as a vital tool in the resolution of financial distress and the distribution of assets in bankruptcy proceedings.

You do not need to wait until the end of bankruptcy when buying assets, start communicating now and communicate often.

Waiting until the end of a bankruptcy process for a 363 sale is not advisable for several reasons. It is crucial to understand the potential drawbacks and risks associated with such a strategy. Here are some key reasons why you should not wait until the end when considering a 363 sale in bankruptcy:

  1. Increased Competition: By waiting until the end of the bankruptcy process, you give other potential buyers an opportunity to express their interest, conduct due diligence, and submit competitive bids. This heightened competition can drive up the prices and reduce the chances of acquiring the desired assets.

  2. Limited Availability: The assets being sold in a bankruptcy are finite. As time passes, the pool of available assets may dwindle as other buyers secure their acquisitions. Waiting until the end may result in a reduced selection of assets or even the complete depletion of desirable options.

  3. Time Constraints: Bankruptcy proceedings can be complex and time-consuming. There are various legal requirements, court approvals, and administrative procedures that need to be fulfilled. By waiting until the end, you may be faced with limited time to navigate these processes effectively, potentially hindering your ability to complete the acquisition in a timely manner.

  4. Uncertain Outcome: Bankruptcy proceedings are inherently unpredictable. Delays, legal disputes, or changes in circumstances can arise, affecting the timing and outcome of the sale. Waiting until the end leaves you vulnerable to these uncertainties and may result in missed opportunities or unfavorable outcomes.

  5. Limited Negotiating Power: Early engagement in the bankruptcy process allows you to build relationships with key stakeholders, such as the debtor-in-possession or bankruptcy trustee. This enables you to understand the debtor's needs, negotiate favorable terms, and potentially influence the decision-making process. By waiting until the end, you lose the opportunity to establish rapport and negotiate from a position of strength.

  6. Lack of Information: Engaging early in the bankruptcy process provides you with crucial information about the assets, their condition, and any associated liabilities. This knowledge allows you to conduct thorough due diligence and make informed decisions. Waiting until the end may limit your access to comprehensive information, leading to increased risks and uncertainties.

  7. Missed Opportunities: Timing is crucial in asset acquisitions. By waiting until the end, you may miss out on favorable market conditions, emerging opportunities, or advantageous partnerships. Acting early allows you to position yourself strategically and seize these opportunities. 

In conclusion, waiting until the end of a bankruptcy process for a 363 sale is not advisable due to increased competition, limited availability of assets, time constraints, uncertain outcomes, reduced negotiating power, lack of information, and missed opportunities. Engaging early and actively participating throughout the process allows you to maximize your chances of successfully acquiring desired assets, negotiate favorable terms, and navigate the complexities of the bankruptcy proceedings more effectively.

Seattle Bankruptcy Attorneys

Do you have questions about and bankruptcy and business law? Contact the experienced Seattle bankruptcy attorneys at Wenokur Riordan PLLC today at (206) 724-0846 to discuss your situation.

Nate Riordan

Nate Riordan

Attorney • Speaker • Podcast Host

Phone: (206) 724-0846

Email: nate@wrlawgroup.com

Nate Riordan received a B.A. with honors from the University of Wisconsin – Madison in 1992 and graduated cum laude from the University of Minnesota Law School in 1998. Nate practiced law in Minneapolis until 2004, where he practiced in the areas of corporate bankruptcy, workouts, restructures, finance, franchise and corporate and transactional law. In 2004, Nate moved to Seattle and has practiced there ever since.

Previous
Previous

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy and Its Role

Next
Next

Vice Media Has Filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection